Naha Resorts & All Inclusive Resorts

Discover the 47 Best Resorts in Naha

About Naha Resorts on Float Homes

Many resorts offer unique water-based accommodations, including floating cabins and overwater villas, ideal for your getaway. Float Homes features more than 47 resorts near Naha, providing a diverse selection of water-based experiences. Whether you're looking for a tranquil retreat or an adventurous vacation on the water, there's something for everyone.

The resorts in Naha offer a variety of amenities, including private pools, Wi-Fi, spas, and pet-friendly accommodations. They cater to a range of travelers, from couples seeking a romantic escape, to families looking for a fun and unique experience, or even groups looking for an unforgettable venue for special occasions like birthdays or reunions.

For a more inclusive experience, some resorts also offer all-inclusive packages, ideal for families or groups looking to enjoy both short and long stays on the water. These resorts provide top amenities such as hot tubs, pools, fine dining, and entertainment options, ensuring a luxurious and memorable experience.

Floay Homes’ extensive selection of resorts near Naha offers the perfect alternative to traditional vacation rentals, making it easier to find the ideal floating accommodation for next adventure.

Show more
Show less

Frequently Asked Questions About Naha Resorts

Most of our listed resorts are suitable for families in Naha. Filter your all-inclusive resorts Naha with a family-friendly option to see which ones are right for you.
Yes, there are more than 47 resorts in Naha that have indoor and private swimming pools. Check out our filter option and find your best resort near Naha.
At Float Homes, the rate for luxury resorts in Naha per night starts from $6. Our partner provides these prices & we calculated the average daily rate in Naha. Please see our partner's price for more details.
Most of the resorts are perfect for travelers, but based on guest reviews in 2026, the best resorts in or near Naha are: